|
|
US Government Watch |
|
| Home | USDOJ Homeland Security | DOJ & Gov. Dark | U.S. Government Watch | World Watch |
| Military Watch | Newspaper/Magazines | Wires/ThinkTanks/Links | Privacy Watch | Fluky News Watch |
|
|
US Government Watch |
|
|
And Now for the New Millennium |
|
Photos & Analysis The Office of Homeland Security Trading Liberty for Alleged Security. Has the Federal Government begun Goose-Stepping us into the Emergence of a Police State? |
|
 |
|
|
Bill Clinton & Terrorism. Radical Islam's war on the West
Barack Obama Enables Terrorism
Obama's Illegal IRS Tax Scandal Deepens as Top IRS Employee Refuses to
Answer any questions.
22 May 2013 © DOJgov.net Lois Lerner, Director of the IRS division that singled out conservative groups to hold off Tax Exempt Status while pushing through pro-Obama groups was indignant. Before a congressional investigation committee, she said "I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws. I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations. And I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee." At the same time, Ms. Lerner refused to answer any questions, invoking the 5th Amendment under grounds that her responses might incriminate her in a potentially criminal act. For nearly 30 years, the rule regarding the requirement that federal employees must cooperate in job related investigations has been clear. The only significant exception to this rule involves a criminal investigation where the employee has the right to remain silent under the self-incrimination clause of the Fifth Amendment to the constitution. As such, Ms. Lerner's claim of not doing anything wrong rings hollow. In the face of her refusal, Obama's tactic might be to secure her resignation. Then again, he might simply have her transferred to a different area in a game of federal musical chairs. This is quite common and might even lead to a promotion. The important thing would be to drop her off the investigative radar and not implicate the President any further. Even more ominous, it's been admitted that information of investigation by the Treasury Department's Inspector General was in the works had been relayed to the White House. According to the Washington Post, this information about the IRS illegally discriminating against conservative groups for Non Profit Status was given to Sr. White House Officials, including Chief of Staff Denis McDonough. Rushing to cover for Obama in a scandal like this is the job of Sr. White House Officials. It's always been this way. But admitting that a scandal of this magnitude reached the most powerful Obama White House aide, it is unlikely that Obama was not informed. Of all people, the President's Chief of Staff has most access to the President. They even decide who does or doesn't see a President. So the plot thickens, so to speak. It answers why the Internal Revenue Service came clean about their sitting on some 500 conservative Not for Profits, keeping them from securing donations during the Obama re-election campaign. No amount of feigned Presidential indignation can alter these facts, as the stench of an illegal Obama Administration brew to hobble a Romney campaign begins to smell worse each day. White House Officials on Benghazi: We Screwed up but didn't do it out of Malice 19 May 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire On 17 May 2013, Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News spoke with administration officials who were in key positions on 11 Sept. 2012, where they acknowledged that a wide range of "mistakes" were made on the night of the Islamist terrorist attacks on U.S. missions in Benghazi, Libya. They also acknowledged alleged "mistakes" made during media interviews and discussions with Congress in the aftermath. For those unfamiliar with "Fed-speak," this is an admission of lying to both the American people and Congress. Let's first dispense with any claims that Obama wanted the Americans to die in Benghazi. It's obvious that Obama didn't want what might be called 911 2012 to occur at all. The fact that a sitting President and Commander in Chief ordered a de facto "Stand Down" for any help and literally refused to take any action whatever for the 7 hours of intermittent attacks is the problem. This would indicate a total lack of executive and military leadership in time of crisis. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under conditions of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. To reveal their names would evoke White House retribution at the highest level. "We're portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots," said one Obama administration official who was part of the Benghazi non-response and later, dispensing of misleading information. "It's actually closer to us being idiots." Since an "idiot" is also an incompetent, truer words were never spoken, although being liars to boot seems to have occurred. 1. The Foreign Emergency Support Team known as "FEST," is described as "the U.S. Government's only interagency, on-call, short-notice team poised to respond to terrorist incidents worldwide." Yet deployment of the counter-terrorism experts on the FEST group were ruled out from the start which is quite puzzling. An administration official who was part of the Benghazi response (but couldn't do anything without Presidential approval) told CBS, "I wish we had." In point of fact, FEST leader Mark Thompson stated, Benghazi was precisely the sort of crisis to which his team is trained to respond. 2. It was unclear what assistance FEST might have provided because they might not have arrived in time. But in the military world, you don't say "heck, we probably won't get there in time, so why bother." Nobody knew how long the attacks would last. They went on intermittently for 7 hours, but could have continued much longer. In any event, the Mission Statement is to make the ATTEMPT, which did not occur. This was never done, under orders from Hillary Clinton's State Department at the highest levels. Obviously, the State Department would not take on the responsibility for actions that could only be ordered by a President who had ducked for cover. 3. Concerning the Obama "talking points," deleting any CIA reference to Islamist terrorists and blaming everything on a spontaneous mob upset over a Youtube video short that few had seen, was even more revealing. On September 13th, Hillary Clinton was asked if she would appear on the upcoming Sunday morning TV shows to spout the lying narrative. "She'd rather chew tin foil," said someone close to Ms. Clinton. On Sept. 14th the CIA's early version of the talking points credited the CIA with providing warnings on Sept. 10, 2012 that the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was in a precarious state. According to White House sources interviewed, it was a "knee-jerk cover your ass moment" and the White House sent out good soldier, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to spread the lies. So there you have it: Benghazi, dead Americans and a pack of public White House lies involved a cowardly President refusing to be a Commander in Chief; high ranking Obama Administration officials who would not put their neck in a Guillotine without Presidential leadership and a pack of public lies used as damage control to keep up the Obama election narrative that "I've killed Bin Ladin and al Quaida is on the run." Criminal? No. Disgraceful? Absolutely. Obama Administration Replies with Surprise, indignation and Denial as Corruption Reigns18 May 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire The last two weeks ended with Obama and his administration gaining solace and relief that three scandal strikes had been kept from the public until after November 2012 Presidential elections. Politics is normally like baseball, in that three strikes and you're out. Strike ONE: It began with the Benghazi scandal as high level CIA whistleblowers came forward before congress to say that military rescue forces were ordered to "stand down" and do nothing during 7 hours of attacks on Americans. Only the President can order a military action or non-action in a foreign country. This resulted in deaths of 4 Americans, but more would have died, had it not been for 2 brave former NAVY Seals. They disobeyed orders, ran to the beleaguered "safe house" and manned a machine gun in the last hours, before being blown to pieces by an Islamist terrorist Mortar shell. Testimony further revealed that while the CIA knew in hours that the attacks were done by Ansar al Sharia, an al Quaida affiliate, their report was revised some 12 times by the White House to deny an organized terrorist attack. It was replaced it with the narrative that there was a "spontaneous demonstration" over a YouTube video few had even seen. Strike TWO: It was revealed and admitted to by the IRS that Christian, conservative and pro-Israeli groups applying for 501 (c) 4 status were stonewalled at the IRS until after the Presidential elections. Thus, they were denied the ability to raise funding that would normally be received by tax exempt organizations. Typically, Pro Obama organizations were rushed through the process. On the other hand, an Idaho Pro-Life Group was even required to send the IRS, texts of their prayers prior to approval consideration. Obama's Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner who controls the IRS evaded almost $30,000 until anteing up when the decision was made to make him Treasury Secretary in late 2008. This should have been a head's up as to the integrity of the impending Obama Administration, but was overlooked for the "transitional" first black President. On May 17th, the New York Times reported that the Inspector General informed the Treasury's general counsel he was auditing the IRS's screening of politically active groups seeking tax exemptions on June 4, 2012. This meant that the Obama administration was aware of the matter during the Presidential campaign year and there was a strong possibility of IRS giving preferential treatment to pro-Obama groups while discriminating against those who might be critical of him. Obama claimed no personal knowledge, but it is well known that a President sets the tone of his administration and agencies, including the IRS. Even worse, Sarah Ingram, the high level IRS operative responsible for determining tax exempt status for organizations is now slotted to be taken off the firing line, promoted and placed in charge of the bureaucracy (including 16,000 new IRS agents) to "impartially" enforce Obamacare. Barack Obama feigned indignation over these illegal acts. When asked if the White House had any knowledge of this (which according to the NYT article they obviously did), he responded with the obfuscational lawyer's quip, "I have no PERSONAL knowledge." Strike THREE: It was reported and admitted to by the Obama Department of Justice that the DOJ spied on 20 Associated Press phone lines used by over 100 AP reporters and editors. For years, the AP was friendly towards Obama and his administration, but for once, the AP reacted with criticism. The Justice Department had just broken an Islamist Terrorist ring in the U.S. and the AP found out about it. They were asked not to report it for 5 days in the interest of national security and agreed. They were then approached and asked that they hold off for one more day. National security concerns had ended, but Obama wanted to use it in a speech to gain political points. Agreement was made that they would hold off reporting this until one hour before the Obama speech, but this was rebuffed by the Obama White House. They offered only 5 minutes before the Obama political speech for the AP to break the report. The AP turned this down, reported the event and in retribution, the White House began spying on the AP reporters. Obama's Eric Holder, first Attorney General in American history to be reappointed after being found in Criminal Contempt of Congress, denied personal knowledge. This is the modus operandi in the Obama Administration. In the past, President's took either credit or personal responsibility for the actions of departments under their control. This seems to have changed which either indicates an incompetent President running a corrupt and incompetent Administration, or a President so scornful of the democratic process that he has designated both himself and his appointees to be above the law. When a President Places Winning an Election Over Saving the Lives of American's from Terrorists 8 May 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire Blistering testimony from State Department whistleblowers tore into Obama administration credibility today, with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton being the one to take the heat. Obama threw the ball to Clinton, while Americans were being butchered in Benghazi Libya and America's Commander in Chief refused to get involved personally. Historically, the prime directive of a demagogue has always been, to never leave a personal footprint. But even after being threatened with destruction of careers, State Department whistleblowers are now giving testimony to congress. The dots were connected into a documented chronology of White House incompetence, callousness toward American life, cover-up and cravenly attempting to keep the lid on terrorist activity until after the November 2012 elections. Gregory Hicks, Deputy Chief of Mission in Tripoli Libya criticized "stand down" orders coming from Obama's Department of Defense. They would not send jets to overfly the attack site. They would not dispatch special forces from the embassy in Tripoli. Hicks said he sought jets to overfly the Benghazi mission. They were at Aviano Air Base in Italy and could be there in a bit more than 2 hours during the 7 hours terrorist nightmare. According to Generals, planes were literally on the tarmac waiting for White House orders that never came. But Hicks was not alone. Also testifying were diplomatic security officer Eric Nordstrom assigned to Libya to the Summer of 2012 and Mark Thompson, acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism. Thompson described how his request for a specialized emergency response team was rebuffed by officials at the White House, speculating that it was as if the White House couldn't grasp what was going on or refused to acknowledge that there was a terrorist crisis. The second Tuesday of November 2012 was nearing a contentious re-election, with the jewel in the crown of an Obama election strategy being "I got Bin Ladin. Al Quaida is on the run and I've beaten terrorism." This was obviously untrue, but one might conclude there was fear that acknowledgement of a well planned terrorist attack on U.S. property and personnel might upset the Obama narrative. As a result, four Americans were butchered that night and others would have followed, if not for two American former Navy SEALS who disobeyed orders to "stand down" and do nothing. They rushed to the last redoubt containing some two dozen personnel. Manning a machine gun, they fought off the Islamist terrorists for several hours until being blown to pieces by a Mortar shell. But their deaths were not in vain. Their heroic stand allowed many to escape. White House proxys such as U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, immediately hit the airwaves, repeating that the attack was caused by an obscure Youtube video few had seen. Obama himself blamed the video for two weeks, even at the United Nations. Many highly placed people in the Obama Administration and the White House itself, knew within a couple of hours that it was a full blown terrorist attack including Hillary Clinton. Obama himself seemed to simply duck for cover. But it seemed that during and for many days after the attack, political expediency took precedence over saving American lives and being honest with the American people. Saudi Source Claims their warning Obama's Homeland Security of Boston Massacre Terrorist. Other Saudi's Back Off under Possible White House Pressure 1 May 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire A Saudi bombshell was dropped on the Obama administration today via the venerable British newspaper The London Daily Mail. According to what the Daily Mail called "a highly placed source who spoke to MailOnline," the Saudis sent a written warning about Tsarnaev to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in 2012. This was long before the Boston terrorist attack that killed and horribly maimed some 180 people in April 2013. The Saudi source claimed direct knowledge of the document claiming that it was based on human intelligence developed independently in Yemen. According to the Saudi source and citing security concerns, the Saudi government also allegedly denied an entry visa to the elder Tsamaev brother in December 2011 when he hoped to make a religious pilgrimage to Mecca. The source claimed that the information was sent to the "highest levels" of Homeland Security, but did not specifically mention anything about an attack in Boston. This was denied by a DHS official who declined to be named, as well as White House Sources. The letter most likely came from the Saudi Ministry of the Interior. At the same time, a Homeland Security official stated under a promise of anonymity that the 2012 letter existed, saying that he was familiar with the letter before the story broke in the British MailOnline. The Saudi official allegedly shared a wealth of information with MailOnline in anonymity because he was not authorized to talk publicly about foreign intelligence. The Saudis denied entrance of Tsamaev into their Kingdom for a Muslim pilgrimage in 2011 on security grounds which seems to substantiate their concern. This came 1 month before his return to the Muslim area of Russia where it is concluded that he received bomb making information. The Saudi government tracks these potential terrorists by setting up bogus jihadi websites and tracking those those who take the bait. This is how they secured information on Richard Reid the "Shoe Bomber" of December 2001 and several other threats. Immediately after the Islamist "Boston massacre," Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal met with Secretary of State John Kerry on April 16th and with Barack Hussein Obama on April 17th, possibly to develop a strategy that deflects additional claims of incompetence from Obama and his administration. A Saudi track record of providing a "heads up" to potential terrorists, adds credibility to the claim that they warned about the Islamist Boston bomber. That it is now being denied by Saudi's could be a way of sparing Obama and his government from further embarrassment. The subsequent Saudi denial could have also come from Obama government pressure. As an Aside Tamerlain Tsamaev was named after Tamerlane, a 15th Century Muslim Central Asian warlord, noted for his cruelty. Among these were creating huge mounds of human skulls during protracted cruelty to Indian Hindus. He is considered a hero in much of the Muslim world. Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Sends Judge to Mirandize Boston Islamist Terrorist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Shut Him Up 26 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire
Contrary to what many people believe, Miranda information need not
be read in cases of national security. None the less, Obama's
Attorney General Eric Holder sent a judge to the bedside of Islamist
terrorist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to have them read, whereupon, he
immediately
Speculation can be made that involvement and support of the terrorist attack in Boston is prevalent in the American Muslim community and other Islamist terrorist sleeper cells in America exist. This contradicts the Barack Obama mantra that "we have terrorists on the run and they are in decline." Immediately after the attack in Boston that killed and maimed some 180 people, Obama Proxys such as political adviser David Axelrod attempted to run interference for radical Islam, stating that the carnage was probably caused over taxes. Prior to being Mirandized, the Islamist terrorist in custody said that he and his brother were on their way to NYC with 5 bombs that they planned to set off in heavily populated Times Square. The only thing that stopped this was that their car ran out of gas on the way and a hostage managed to escape and inform authorities of their whereabouts. After Boston Terror attack, Americans Put on a Bovine Display of Willingly Discarding Their Individual Liberty 25 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire Setting aside the barbaric brutality and carnage of the Islamic Terrorists at the Boston Marathon, we can use the occasion as defining three crucial, national benchmarks. The first involves how far government authority will go in tossing away the rights of innocent citizens. The second is how capricious authority acts towards innocent citizens in areas that are de-facto "gun free zones." Perhaps most ominous, it is how willingly, average Americans bow to authority and surrender their Constitutional rights. In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon Islamist Terrorist Bombing, police and federal officers in full military style gear with brandished machine guns, stormed out of the type of armored fighting vehicles used in military combat zones.
Watertown Mass is a small city of some 31,000 people. The cordon was placed around a Middle Class district of 20 blocks. Setting aside the fact that the Terrorist was captured outside the cordon and discovered by a civilian, thousands of innocent Americans became rounded up captives of government authority. The area was transformed into a Gulog with its citizens deprived of their Constitutional protections.
At first, thousands of American citizens were ordered to remain in their homes. Given the fact that Massachusetts citizens have been deprived of most means of self defense, they greeted the the demands of the paramilitary force with relief. But that was only step one. Shortly afterward, machine gun wielding make believe soldiers went house to house. They banged on doors and sometimes bashed them in if people didn't respond quickly enough. Machine guns were brandished and sometimes pointed at people as they were ordered to leave their property. At that point, local and federal authorities invaded each home, rummaging through private property and memories at whim.
Sadly and rather prophetically, the citizens of Watertown didn't seem to mind. They appeared happy to become part of the experiment in Martial Law. The vast majority seemed relieved to surrender everything America stands for, preferring the mindless denigration of transformation into cattle of the slaughter house. Perhaps this is the most frightening lesson to be gleaned from government authoritarianism gone amok. The American people don't seem to mind. The people of Massachusetts have fallen far beneath their Revolutionary ancestors of Lexington and Concord. After some 200 years, the American spirit of independence has morphed into that of craven cowardice. Most certainly, ever encroaching government bureaucrats will take note of this American spiritual fecklessness as lockdown and Martial Law becomes the new American norm. Obama Government Incompetency Further Revealed After Boston Islamist Terrorist Attack 24 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire According to the Boston Globe, Russian authorities alerted the U.S. government not once but "multiple times" over their concerns about Tamerian Tsarnaev. This includes a second time, nearly a year after he was first interviewed by FBI agents in Boston. This raises new questions about whether the FBI should have focused more attention on the Boston Marathon Islamist bomber according to U.S. Senators who were briefed on 22 April 2013. Previously, the FBI said that Tsarnaev was interviewed in 2011 after the Russian warning but determined that he was not a threat. It now comes out in a 23 April 2013 briefing to the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russia alerted the United States about Tsarnaev "multiple times." According to Senator Richard Burr of NC, the briefing revealed failures among federal agencies to share vital information about Tsarnaev, indicating that 12 years after 911, federal agencies can not "connect the dots" about would be terrorists residing in America. Senator Susan Collins of Maine and a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee stated "I'm very concerned that there still seems to be serious problems with the sharing of information, including critical investigative information." She went on to say "This is troubling to me, this many years after the attacks on our country in 2001 that we still seem to have stovepipes that prevent information from being shared effectively, not only among agencies, but also within the same agency." On 24 April 2013, Reuters stated that the name of one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects Tamerian Tsarnaev was listed on the U.S. Government's highly classified central database of people it views as potential terrorists, but no action seems to have been taken. This flies in the face of President Barack Hussein Obama's claim that the agencies he is responsible for have a firm handle on terrorism. Barack Obama's Homeland Security FBI Blows Prior Investigation on Boston Islamist Terrorist Bomber and Enables Terrorist Attack20 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire According to a 19 April 2013 FBI Press release, once the FBI learned the identities of the two brothers, they reviewed its records and determined that in early 2011, a "foreign government" (presumably Russia) asked the FBI for information about Tamerlan Tsarnaev. The request stated that it was based on information that he had become a follower of radical Islam and a strong believer who had changed drastically since 2010. They went on to say this occurred as he prepared to leave the United States for travel to that country (Russia) on January 12th 2012, apparently to join unspecified underground groups. In response to this 2011 request, the FBI checked U.S. government databases and other information to look for such things as derogatory telephone communications, possible use of online sites associated with the promotion of radical activity, associations with other persons of interest, travel history and plans, and education history. The FBI also interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev and family members. The FBI did not find any terrorism activity, domestic or foreign. Those results were provided to the foreign government in the summer of 2011. The FBI requested but did not receive more specific or additional information from the foreign government. They allowed him to leave America for 6 months and did not even place Tamerlan Tsarnaev on a watch list. Another Islamist Terrorist attack on America under Obama's Watch
19 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire
You wouldn't know it from the way most of the media plays down the Islamist connection to terrorism, but there have been numerous, successful terrorist attacks on America under Barack Hussein Obama.
You had the November 5, 2009 slaughter in Ft. Hood Texas by Islamist Major Hassan. There was the Underwear bomber on a plane over Detroit on Christmas Day December 25, 2009. You had the Times Square Bomber of May 1 2010.
The Ft. Hood Islamist terror attack was done with guns. The Underwear Bomber's attempt at mass murder in the name of Islam failed to fully explode, only because of a poor detonation device. It was the same with the Times Square Bomber who would have killed hundreds, had it not been for a defective detonator.
Well, practice makes perfect as was shown on Patriot's Day 2013 in Boston, which is always held in mid April to honor the American Revolution that gave birth to our American Nation. Their annual runners marathon was marked by two explosive devices that actually had effective detonators. It resulted in the death of several people and injury to over 100, with arms and legs blown off many.
The explosives were placed in pressure cookers and combined with ball bearings and nails. This type of explosive device is designed to tear people to pieces. It's an explosive of choice of Muslim terrorists.
The liberal press such as Salon Magazine immediately responded, saying that they hoped it was done by those "evil" right wing white men. But this turned out not to the case. The murder spree was accomplished by two young immigrants from Muslim Chechnya who had been in America for over 10 years. They received an American education and "seemed" well integrated into American society.
One may wonder what makes makes Muslim Immigrants go to sleep appearing normal and wake up as rabid, blood thirsty, America hating Islamists. What makes so many other Muslim immigrants to America silently support their actions?
But when push comes to shove, it doesn't really matter. To say "why did they do this" implies that the United States is the provocateur. This mindset is seems to be the liberal/progressive way of paying homage to the most depraved of 3rd Worlders, just as long as they despise America.
Huge numbers of Muslims from radical Muslim countries are arriving on our shores. This is particularly true under the Obama administration. They are now in our government. The radical Muslim Student's Association has chapters in some 500 colleges. We have radical Muslim clerics in our military.
But all of this is played down by the Obama administration. After over 3 years, Major Hassan is still receiving his Army Major's pay and the trial has yet to begin in earnest. Perhaps Barack Hussein Obama is hoping we will forget. His administration has already classified this murder spree in the name of Islam as "workplace violence" and won't give the dead and wounded soldiers Purple Hearts.
Barack Hussein Obama will kill overseas terrorists from time to time as a political display of his desire to fight terrorism although Islamic terrorism is a term not to be mentioned. Actions of the Obama administration have installed The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt under Sharia Islamic Law and our running guns to the Islamist "freedom fighters" in Syria will do the same in that country.
With much of the Muslim world nuclear, going nuclear or thinking of going nuclear, future attacks on America and it's people will dwarf what happened on 911 and the slaughter of some 3,000 innocent American civilians. Sadly, Obama and his administration seem to be in a state of denial of the Islamist threat, either through ignorance or design.
The End is nearing for Americans as the dollar is being eliminated as World Currency Standard
1 April 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire
The only reason Obama and others could play with injecting trillions of paper money into the economy and running huge deficits is because the dollar is considered "the world currency." Every other currency is pegged against the dollar so we could afford to be irresponsible. But this is coming to an end and when it does, our savings will be worthless and costs will soar.
The latest to jump off the dollar valuation system is Australia and China. They will now have direct currency conversions in trade without using the dollar as an intermediary. This is following an ominous trend that's been going on for a while, as one nation after another begins cutting the dollar out as a standard exchange medium.
Already, the world's Second and third largest (China and Japan) economies are to bypass the Dollar and engage In Direct Currency Trade. China and Russia are doing the same. China And Iran will bypass dollar valuations and plan an oil barter system. India and Japan are signing new 15 billion currency swap agreement. India will be joining the Asian Dollar Exclusion Zone transacting with Iran in Rupees. In the western Hemisphere, Brazil is signing a China Currency Swap, excluding the need of conversion against the dollar.
Within a few more years, the dollar will be little more than inflated currency to be matched against others for valuation, rather than the reverse and the book on the American dream will be closed. Of course, Obama will blame George Bush, Republicans and old white men, but perhaps poverty will awaken the American people. America.... A Nation of Bastards
21 March 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire
Well, the statistics are in and America has literally become a nation of Bastards. It seems that 48 percent of first births are by unwed mothers, and by age 30 two-thirds of American women have had a child, typically out of wedlock. What a great way of welcoming the Hitlarian view that by diminishing the cohesiveness of the family and replacing the husband with devotion and dependence on the state, we can begin our 1,000 year American Reich.
For this, I must say that the blame comes down on women who in the
40's and 50's in particular, held family cohesiveness and
childbearing in their hands. The problem is that many never thought
of themselves as being the controlling lynchpin for this cornerstone
of society. They were the true power behind the blustering male
ego.
As such, all too many of their children jumped on the downside of
the Woman's Movement which preached that "liberation" and equality
with men was demanding access to the worst traits of men. Part of
this was surrendering the concept of Marriage where they could reign
and substituting irresponsible Bastard breeding, combined with
embracing the chains of government upkeep.
Thus, it seems that all too many women have not gained self respect
through a perversion of social equality. They have degraded
themselves to the point of accepting the status of irresponsible
children, becoming the wards of government servitude and control.
No wonder the majority of them vote Democrat. It offers them
slavery by another name.
In the Muslim world, they call this Sharia. In America, it's rules
of the Welfare State.
Just some thoughts from Colonel Mikey (as my lovely Caryl calls me),
who is devoted putty in her hands.
Department of Homeland Security Secures 2,700 Armored Fighting Vehicles. Who are they Planning on using these against in the Streets of America?
5 March 2013 © DOJgov.net Newswire
It was whispered about in what some dismissively call "conspiracy" websites and shunned by the Obama friendly mainstream media. But facts, no matter where they may be posted are still facts.
Navistar Defense LLC has admitted to producing and refitting some 2,700 Armored Fighting Vehicles for the Department of Homeland Security. These are not merely armored cars. They are beasts weighing almost 20 tons. The Bradley Armored Fighting vehicle weighs somewhat more, but only because of it's cannon turret and tread, rather than tire assembly and gun ports.
Thus, we have 2,700 armored military weapons systems designed for subduing populations in cities and towns, rather than on a desert battlefield. We have a civilian agency gunning up as a domestic military force designed to subdue millions of civilians in America.
To quote Barack Obama on July 2, 2008 "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as our military"
It appears that President Obama has achieved this dream. Not only that but the Department of Homeland Security has purchase contracts for some 1.2 Billion rounds of ammunition. This is ten times more than the yearly expenditure of ammunition in Iraq at the height of the conflict.
Obama Administration's Proposed Army Manual Gives Tacit Approval to Pedophilia
14 December 2012 © DOJgov.net Newswire
The Wall Street Journal has just published a draft of Barack Obama's
proposed new Army Manual. The draft handbook offers a list of "taboo
conversation topics" in Afghanistan that soldiers should avoid, including
"making derogatory comments about the Taliban," "advocating women's rights,"
or "any criticism of pedophilia."
Banning talk of the Taliban raises an interesting point. It would be similar to the absurdity of a World War II Army Manual ordering American troops not to criticize Nazis. General Petraeus Comes Clean: White House Hid Terrorism and Murder at Benghazi Libya 16 November 2012 © DOJgov.net Newswire Representative Peter King stated that former CIA Director David Petraeus testified he almost immediately knew the Benghazi attack was terrorism and that the talking points given to Ambassador Susan Rice were different from the ones prepared by the CIA. Petraeus stated Rice's talking points were edited to play down Islamist terrorism occurring on the Anniversary of the 911 Terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. This raises serious and possibly Impeachable questions. After two months, President Barack Hussein Obama has refused to say where he was and what he was doing when a well coordinated attack took place on U.S. facilities in Benghazi Libya. The 8 hour attack involved mortar and RPG rocket fire, resulting in the deaths of four Americans including the American Ambassador to Libya and Navy SEALS. Events were transmitted in real time to the White House itself. We know that Barack Obama was in the White House at the time. We know that the following day, he flew to Nevada for a campaign fundraiser. We now know that for two weeks and long after intelligence services knew the truth of the attack, President Obama equivocated between the possibility of terrorism and the White House story that it was caused by an obscure YouTube video that had been around for months and few people ever watched. For months prior, Barack Obama had been bragging about killing Osama Bin Laden, strongly inferring that he had eliminated the terrorist menace. This was in spite of evidence that al Quaida related forces were not only alive and well, but spreading throughout North Africa. This raises the question as to whether Barack Obama ordered that available forces do nothing in the way of rescue, in the hopes that they could redefine the narrative and help in his re-election bid. If so, it can be stated that through High Crimes and Misdemeanors, Barack Obama is a criminal who has just been re-elected for a second term. Eulogy for a Once Great Nation. Obama wins a Second Term in 2012 6 November 2012 © Michael G. Leventhal I’m glad that I probably won’t be around in another twenty years. If I were, I’d be deemed a non tax-paying parasite on the state. The cost of my maintenance would warrant that I be discarded as counter productive. Perhaps they’d even use my body for bio fuel. 2012 marks that last election in America where there is a true two party system. From now on, it’s an increasingly left wing Democrat Party with any other used as window dressing to create the illusion of democracy. For all intent and purposes, we’ve become Venezuela. Obama’s first four years was one of establishing the mechanisms for internet censorship and National Defense Authorization Act indefinite incarceration. The next four years will begin the implementation stage. Don’t worry. It will begin slowly. You won’t even see it happening until they come for you. We can kiss the concept of national autonomy goodbye. Through a series of United Nations Treaties, America becomes one of many provinces, dominated by an unelected bureaucracy of dictatorships under the U.N. Mantle. Perhaps our military will be slipped into the U.N. conglomerate, being used to further their policy of “Responsibility to Protect.” Any nation whose people raise their head for “unapproved” change will be brutally crushed. Economically, the once dynamic United States can kiss it’s average annual growth rate of 3.5% goodbye. At best it will be 2% and even that will only exist in non-recession years. “Recovery” will continue to be viewed as between 1.5-2% which means de facto decline in national wealth. Unemployment will cease to be a factor as increasing millions are put on the dole and paid with an inflated currency that will prove to be increasingly worthless. Innovation will cease since there is no benefit in creativity. America will simply stumble along, slowly declining until becoming one more backwater outpost in a world government with a privileged class living a lavish lifestyle. Eventually it will be relegated to the dustbin of history, fractured into numerous small backwaters run by United Nations appointees. Hopefully, I will never live long enough to see this, but our children certainly will. I hope they will enjoy their hope and change living in a sci-fi movie of monotony, uniformity, mediocrity and repression. They probably won’t remember the difference, because nobody will be left to tell them of the American “City On The Hill.” In George Orwell's book 1984 it was stated, "Who controls the past controls the future, who controls the present controls the past." Will the last one to remember America, please turn out the lights.
| |
Site
Map
stopped
providing information to authorities.
